Articles | Open Access
Vol. 3 No. 6 (2018)
|
Page No.: 92-99 |
https://doi.org/10.15520/sslej.v3i6.2196
Subdirecci´on de Estudios Profesionales A, Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Coacalco, Coacalco, M´exico
Subdirecci´on de Estudios Profesionales A, Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Coacalco, Coacalco, M´exico
Subdirecci´on de Estudios Profesionales A, Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Coacalco, Coacalco, M´exico
Abstract
Workaholism is a syndrome identified in individuals with excessive compulsive behaviors and beliefs into work activities,
and to establish a pattern of behavior oriented and pro-competitive behavior by hostile personality. This paper presents
a structured pattern of behavior syndrome and 184 workers in an institution of educational services analysis. Through
an instrument which combined elements DUWAS-measuring short version and a questionnaire that identifies Behavior
Patterns Based on Personality. With the instrument designed, a linear probability model (MLP) was proposed. It was
reported that the variables UT and CP had a significant effect on work addiction. The model presented argues that the
addiction of work, is manifested in those people who believe to have an obsessive compulsion to work, and behave with
excessive and multiple actions of work, besides having an urgency for the time to fulfill their work impulses.
Keywords:
workaholism, compulsion to work, overwork, Type A personality, DUWAS
References
1. Polaino A. El workaholism como neurosis de autorrealizaci´on
en el trabajo. En Buend´ıa. In: Estr´es laboral y salud. Madrid,
Espa˜na: Biblioteca Nueva; 1998. p. 159–171.
2. Garrido M. Adicci´on al trabajo: caracter´ısticas, detecci´on y
prevenci´on desde una perspectiva integral. Revista Enfermer´ıa
Global. 2014;33:362. 369.
3. Blanch JM, Sahag´un M, Cervantes G. Estructura factorial del
cuestionario de condiciones de trabajo. Revista de Psicolog´ıa
del Trabajo y de las. Organizaciones. 2010;26(3):175–189.
4. Influencia de las variables de personalidad en la adicci´on al
trabajo en un estudio con profesores universitarios. Jornades
de Fomentl de la Investigaci´o. 2003;1:11.
5. Aziz S, Zickar MJ. A cluster analysis investigation of
workaholism as a syndrome. Journal Occupational Health
Psychology,11. 2006;52:62.
6. Del ML, Llorens S, Schaufeli W, Salanova M. Adicci´on al
trabajo: concepto y evaluaci´on (I). Gesti´on pr´actica de riesgos
laborales; 2006. 30.
7. Cardona MC, Chiner E, Lattur A. Diagn´ostico psicopedag
´ogico. Conceptos b´asicos y aplicaciones. San Vicente,
EspaËœna: Club Universitario; 2006.
8. Schaufeli WB, Shimazu A, Taris TW. Driven to work
excessively hard. The evaluation of a two-factormeasures of
workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural
Research. 2009;43:320. 348.
9. Del ML, Llorens S, Salanova M, SchaufeliW. Validityof a brief
workaholism scale. Psicothema,22. 2010;1:143. 150.
10. Griffin RW, Moorhead G. Comportamiento organizacional.
Gesti´on de personas y organizaciones (9ªed.). M´exico:
Cengage Learning; 2010.
11. Myrtek M. Meta-analyses of prospective studies on coronary
heart disease, type A personality, and hostility. International
JournalofCardiology,79. 2001;2(3):245. 251.
12. Argibay MM. Seguridad y salud laboral. Manual de prevenci´on
de riesgos para el empleado administrativo de entidades
financieras.EspaËœna: Ideas Propias; 2004.
13. Moreno BG, E. Salud laboral, riesgos laborales psicosociales
y bienestar laboral. M´exico: Pir´amide; 2013.
14. Carrasco AM, Corte CM, Le´on JM. Engagement: a resource to
optimize the psychosocial health in organizations and prevent
burnout and job stress. Revista Digital de Prevenci´on. 2010;1(1
– 22).
15. Garrosa E, I C. Salud laboral y bienestar. Incorporaci´on de
modelos positivos a la comprensi´on y prevenci´on de los riesgos
Social Science Learning Education Journal
8 Social Science Learning Education Journal 03 (6)
psicosociales del trabajo. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo.
2011;57(1):224. 238.
16. Hern´andez R, Fern´andez C, Baptista P. Metodolog´ıa de la
investigaci´on (5ªed.). M´exico: Mc Graw Hill; 2010.
17. Celina H, Campo A. Aproximaci´on al uso del coeficiente
alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatr´ıa,34.
2005;4:572. 580.
18. Gujarati DN, Porter DC. Econometr´ıa (5ªed.). M´exico:
McGraw Hill; 2009.
19. Vacca G. Definiendo las variables. Odontolog´ıa Sanmarquina.
1999;1(4):61–62.
20. Salanova M, Schaufeli W, Mart´ınez I, Bres´o E. How obstacle
and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating
role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress &
Coping. 2010;23(1):53–70.
21. Casta˜neda E. Adicci´on al trabajo (workaholism). Patolog´ıa psicosocial
del siglo XXI. Salud trab. (Maracay). 2010;18(1):57–
66.
22. Casta˜neda E, Alba JE. Perspectivas actuales de la adicci´on al
trabajo. Psicolog´ıa y salud. 2011;21(1):131–139.
Social Science
Copyrights & License
Copyright © 2018
.
Noe Chavez Hernandez,
Rogel Fernando Retes Mantilla,
Margarita Davila Hernandez, this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
